12 First Avenue, Orangeville, ON L9W 1H8, Canada
Phone: (519) 940 - 8309
Fax: (519) 940 - 0526

Fraud Charge Defence

Being charged with fraud does not mean you will be convicted. Many fraud allegations grow out of failed business deals, workplace accounting disputes, benefit overpayments, or transactions that went wrong, situations where there was never an intent to defraud anyone. In many cases there are viable defences or ways to resolve the matter without a criminal conviction.

Under section 380 of the Criminal Code, fraud is depriving another person, or the public, of money, property, or a service by deceit, falsehood, or other fraudulent means. The value alleged determines how the charge is prosecuted and the maximum penalty that applies.

Foote Law represents people charged with fraud offences throughout Ontario, from the investigation stage through disclosure review, resolution discussions, and trial.

What the Crown Must Prove

The Three Elements

Many people believe fraud requires the other side to have actually lost money. That is not the case. Placing someone's financial interests at risk can be enough, even where no loss ever occurred.

To convict, the Crown must prove:

  • A dishonest act, by deceit, falsehood, or other fraudulent means
  • That the act deprived someone, or put their financial interests at risk
  • That the accused knew the act was dishonest and knew it could cause that deprivation

Important Distinction

An honest misunderstanding of the facts can be a defence. Intending to repay the money is not, though restitution can still support a resolution.

Common Types of Fraud Allegations

Fraud charges in Ontario arise in many settings, including:

  • Employment fraud, such as alleged false expenses, payroll manipulation, or misuse of company funds
  • Benefit fraud involving government programs
  • Bank, cheque, and e-transfer fraud
  • Credit and debit card fraud
  • Real estate and mortgage fraud
  • Insurance fraud

Fraud Against an Employer

An allegation of fraud against an employer is also treated as a breach of trust. These clients often deal with a workplace investigation, termination, and a criminal charge all at once, and each affects the others.

Fraud Over and Under $5,000

01

Fraud Under $5,000

Under section 380(1)(b) of the Criminal Code, this is a hybrid offence, so the Crown may proceed by indictment or by summary conviction. The maximum is two years on indictment, or two years less a day on summary conviction.

02

Fraud Over $5,000

Under section 380(1)(a), this is a straight indictable offence with a maximum sentence of fourteen years. Where the total value alleged exceeds one million dollars, the Criminal Code sets a mandatory minimum sentence of two years. Large-scale allegations, and those involving a breach of trust, are prosecuted most seriously.

03

Related Charges

Fraud is often laid together with other counts, and each must be proven separately. These may include:

  • Identity theft (section 402.2), obtaining or possessing someone's identity information for use in a crime
  • Identity fraud (section 403), fraudulently personating another person
  • Forgery and use of a forged document (sections 366 and 368)
  • False pretences (section 362)
  • Possession or laundering of proceeds of crime
04

Bail and Release Conditions

Most people charged with fraud are released rather than held, but the conditions can be significant. Common conditions include no contact with the complainant, who is often a current or former employer, no attendance at the workplace involved, and sometimes restrictions on banking or handling money for others. Breaching any condition is a separate criminal offence.

Sentencing for Fraud Offences

There is no single sentence for a fraud conviction. Courts weigh:

Factors Courts Consider

  • The value involved
  • Whether the accused held a position of trust
  • The degree of planning and how long the conduct continued
  • The number of people affected
  • Restitution and steps taken to repay
  • The accused's record and personal circumstances

Possible Outcomes

  • For lower-value first allegations: diversion where available, a discharge where legally available, probation, or a fine
  • Larger frauds and breach of trust cases are treated far more seriously
  • A conviction produces a permanent criminal record with consequences for employment, professional licensing, travel, and immigration status

Why Early Legal Advice Matters

Why Early Legal Advice Matters

Fraud cases are usually built over months, and the early stage is where the most protection is available. Early legal representation may help:

  • Protect your right to remain silent before any interview with police, an employer, or an investigator
  • Preserve emails, records, and account history that support your side
  • Address a parallel workplace investigation without damaging the criminal defence
  • Open discussions with the Crown, including restitution, before positions harden
  • Test whether the Crown can prove dishonesty and intent, not just a transaction gone wrong

How Foote Law Can Help

Foote Law defends clients facing fraud charges at every stage of the proceeding:

  • Review of Crown disclosure, including the financial and electronic records these cases turn on
  • Advice during a police or workplace investigation, before any statement is given
  • Defence of the intent element, which is the central issue in most fraud prosecutions
  • Charter applications where searches, production orders, or questioning were unlawful
  • Negotiation with the Crown on resolution, including restitution and withdrawal where the facts support it
  • Representation at bail hearings, pre-trial proceedings, and trial in the Ontario Court of Justice and Superior Court of Justice

We accept Legal Aid Ontario certificates and Employee Assistance Program (EAP) referrals.

Frequently Asked Questions

Click any question to read the answer.

Yes. The Crown only needs to show that someone's financial interests were put at risk by a dishonest act, not that a loss actually occurred.

Value sets the maximum penalty: fraud of $5,000 or less carries a maximum of two years, while fraud over $5,000 carries a maximum of fourteen years. Where the total value alleged exceeds one million dollars, a two-year minimum sentence applies.

No. An intention to repay does not undo the dishonesty or deprivation at the time of the act, though restitution can still support diversion or a more favourable resolution.

Identity theft is obtaining or possessing someone's identity information intending it be used to commit a crime. Identity fraud is actually using that information to personate someone else.

The owner of this website has made a commitment to accessibility and inclusion, please report any problems that you encounter using the contact form on this website. This site uses the WP ADA Compliance Check plugin to enhance accessibility.